Stewart, Wald & Smith files new Lakeshore Trail lawsuit in Muskegon
Stewart, Wald & Smith has filed a new federal Rails-to-Trails lawsuit on behalf of additional Lakeshore Trail landowners in Muskegon, after recovering more than $755,000 in an earlier case for 25 property owners. The firm is also holding free meetings this month to explain who may still be eligible for compensation.
Why it matters: - The new case could open the door to compensation for additional landowners whose property interests may have been affected when a former railroad corridor became the Lakeshore Trail. - Rails-to-Trails disputes can hinge on whether the railroad held only a use right, not full ownership, under the land. - If the conversion triggered a federal taking, adjoining owners may have a Fifth Amendment claim for just compensation.
What happened: - Stewart, Wald & Smith filed Ghezzi v. United States, Case No. 26-680L, in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. - The lawsuit covers additional landowners along the Lakeshore Trail in Muskegon. - The firm said this is its third lawsuit involving the Lakeshore Trail corridor. - Earlier this year, Stewart, Wald & Smith recovered $755,902 for 25 landowners in 1950 Lakeshore Drive, LLC, et. al. v. United States, Case No. 22-902L. - The earlier settlement compensated those owners for the federal taking tied to the trail conversion.
The details: - The lawsuit seeks payment from the United States government for property owners who may have lost valuable property rights. - The former railroad corridor was converted into a public recreational trail. - Whether a property qualifies depends on its ownership history and records. - Stewart, Wald & Smith says many people assume railroads owned the land under their tracks, but in many places the railroad only held a right to use the land for railroad operations. - When rail service ends, those rights can end too, and ownership may revert to adjoining property owners. - The firm says property owners who believe their land adjoins the Lakeshore Trail corridor may still be eligible to join the new case. - The firm is hosting three complimentary informational meetings for nearby property owners. - The meetings are set for Wednesday, August 19, 2026 at 6:00 p.m., and Thursday, August 20, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. - All meetings will be held at the Boys & Girls Club of the Muskegon Lakeshore Conference Room, 900 W. Western Ave., Muskegon, MI 49441. - The sessions will cover the new lawsuit, how Rails-to-Trails cases work, questions from property owners, and who may be eligible for just compensation. - Stewart, Wald & Smith is a national law firm devoted exclusively to Rails-to-Trails litigation. - The firm says it has represented thousands of landowners for more than twenty years and recovered more than $415 million in compensation. - More information is available at the firm’s website or by calling (314) 720-0220. - The release also lists contact information for Jacqueline Tebbe at Stewart Wald and Smith, LLC, including the same phone number. - The release includes social media links for LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and X.
Between the lines: - The firm is signaling more claims may follow if additional Lakeshore Trail owners decide to review their property records. - The earlier settlement suggests the corridor has already produced measurable payouts for some affected owners. - Rails-to-Trails cases often turn on old title documents, easements and how the original railroad rights were written.
What's next: - Property owners who think their land borders the Lakeshore Trail can attend one of the meetings or contact Stewart, Wald & Smith promptly. - The newly filed case will proceed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. - More claims may be added if eligible landowners come forward.
The bottom line: - Stewart, Wald & Smith is trying to expand compensation claims tied to the Lakeshore Trail conversion, with a new federal case and outreach meetings aimed at nearby property owners.
Disclaimer: This article was produced by AGP Wire with the assistance of artificial intelligence based on original source content and has been refined to improve clarity, structure, and readability. This content is provided on an “as is” basis. While care has been taken in its preparation, it may contain inaccuracies or omissions, and readers should consult the original source and independently verify key information where appropriate. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, investment, or other professional advice.
Sign up for:
Today in Law
The daily local news briefing you can trust. Every day. Subscribe now.
Check Your Email!
We sent a one-time activation link to: .
Confirm it's you by clicking the email link.
If the email is not in your inbox, check spam or try again.
Welcome back!
is already signed up. Check your inbox for updates.